If you follow Arsenal via NewsNow, as I often do, you would get the impression it is business as usual in the Premier League and at Arsenal in particular. Despite the raging coronavirus pandemic now taking lives and civil liberties worldwide, almost every article is the usual transfer porn deliberately designed as click bait for horny football fans. Apparently NewsNow is aware that many fans are seduced by the myth that a sexy footballer will be theirs, if only their club will flash the cash.
At the time of writing this blog the following were the headlines of the top Arsenal stories:
- ‘I was amazed’: Wenger was stunned by £45m man Arteta reportedly wants at Arsenal
- Arsenal plan complicated raid for two brothers currently impressing in Serie A
- “Could pair well with Saliba”, “Would have him over Upa” – Many AFC fans discuss £40m-rated man
- Ceballos could open door for Arsenal to sign £17m French star – Our View
- The player Arsene Wenger wanted to replace him as Arsenal manager – and it wasn’t Mikel Arteta
- ‘Will replace Pepe instantly’: Some fans react after hearing Arsenal want their attacker
Seems to me the publications who generate this rubbish on NewsNow think football fans in England and the rest of the world are idiots who live in a bubble; unable to connect the Premier League to the crashing economies in our various countries, lockdowns, quarantines, self-isolation and social distancing that we are now experiencing. These NewsNow articles reek of absolute insanity.
In reality it doesn’t take a genius to recognize that professional football in general and the Premier League in particular are taking severe financial blows as long as the pandemic rages and normal economic and social activity is suspended.
While I take anything they write with a grain of salt, the Daily Mail recently reported:
“Premier League ‘would have to pay £762m’ if they don’t finish 2019-20 season due to contract breaches in television agreements”
If anywhere close to the truth, this represents a huge loss to all top flight clubs who are very dependent on broadcast revenue to meet high fixed costs which must be met whether or not a ball is kicked. This includes the following:
- Players wages
- Salaries for managers and executives
- Interest costs for loans and overdrafts
- Overheads for maintaining a stadium (insurance, security, etc)
Barca losing 110 million euros
From my research, so far no top-flight English club has come out and explained the extent of the bleeding they are now suffering. But across the Channel, over in Spain, Marca has reported that Barcelona will lose at least 100 million euros ($110.7 million) due to the worldwide coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis. Furthermore the club wanted players to cut their salaries by 70 percent until June 30 as a way of saving around 106 million euros.
By going public, Barca succeeded in getting the players onside. (Who wants to look greedy in a country ravaged by a rising tide of deaths from COVID-19?) The latest news is that an agreement has been reached for the players to take a temporary hit to their wages.
Even Lionel Messi, who was No. 1 footballer on Forbes latest Rich List, was on the defensive. According to him, Barcelona’s players are “surprised” that people inside the club would want to pressure them into taking wage cuts and confirmed the squad are happy to take a 70% hit on their salaries because of the coronavirus pandemic. Don’t fret for Lionel though. His wage, in excess of €600,000 per week, is only about 25% of his estimated annual earnings of $120 million, most of which is from endorsements.
Meanwhile Newcastle and Tottenham have put their non-playing staff on furlough while their players join their colleagues in the PFA and refuse to take a pay cut.
While Barcelona is one of the biggest clubs in the world, earning and spending more than almost all its English counterparts, their drive to cut expenses is a telling sign of the agony facing Premier League outfits.
Arsenal revenue losses could be as high as £112 million
As a Gooner am especially concerned for our club. Based on 2017-18 financial statements, revenue from Gate and matchday as well as TV and broadcasting totalled £279 million. Worst case scenario I estimate there could be as much as 40% or £112 million cut in revenue once this season is finally blown off. Below is a breakout of Arsenal’s revenues:
- Gate and matchday income £99m
- TV and Broadcasting £180m
- Retail £26m
- Commercial £107m
- Property development £15m
- Player trading £2m
- Net finance charges £9m
To end where I started, with potentially substantial losses in revenue due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all these stories by NewsNow of major transfers by Arsenal are fairy tales, only suitable for incredulous children or horny transfer addicts. In fact the prospect of Arsenal returning to football in the near future is even bleaker after mayor Sadiq Khan reportedly sent letters to London clubs requesting they volunteer their medical staff and facilities to help the city fight the pandemic.
All things considered, seems to me Arsenal and other top-flight clubs are in a battle to remain in business as they could easily become insolvent if they don’t have the financial reserves to weather the crisis. Meanwhile, last time I checked, there is no government offering a bailout for football clubs.
Given that many of us have may more pressing personal issues due to life changes caused by the pandemic, this article may be a welcome distraction. As they say misery loves company. On that note I welcome your comments.
What you are saying is the reality.
The players and a lot of the fans appear to wish to ignore the reality.
With the average annual salary in the premier league in the millions, money that the players will never really be able to spend, unless they throw it away on more and more flashy cars and palaces, I doubt if there will be many, if an,y fans who would find anything objectionable to the players taking a substantial cut in their wages, especially as they are not playing.
We, the fans, who all earn a year only a fraction of what many of them earn in a week, are suffering financially, so why should they not accept less of what is already too much.
If they do not, and do not do so willingly, they can expect the clubs, even ones like our to go under and the fans put off footbal for a long time, if not for ever.
I doubt if we or any club will have 45 million beans, let alone pounds when this is all over.
Clearly you are one of the few that share my belief that Arsenal as well as most Premier League face a dire financial future. Time will tell.
What I, and I am sure most fans, want to see is the players showing an element of solidarity with the fans in particular and country in general by agreeing substantial reductions in their wages during this crisis time, when they are neither working nor training
Not only agreeing, but offering without being asked, or having their arms twisted.
Should they not do so then that will anther knife in the corpse of the sport and the club.